The Role of Immigration in the President’s Re-Election

10 Nov

One of the most pivotal moments in the 2012 campaign was when former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney attacked Texas governor Rick Perry for being soft on immigration. More than his famous “oops” moment, this moment doomed the campaign of Governor Perry. Perry never recovered from the sustained attack on him that occurred after the governor challenged GOP orthodoxy regarding the availability of in-state tuition for undocumented immigrants. Perry had signed the so called Texas Dream Act, which allows undocumented Texas residents to attend state institutions at tuition levels commensurate with their documented classmates. Despite Perry’s extreme conservative positions on everything else, this minor expression of compassion for the undocumented residents of his state ended the Tea Party’s romance with the Texas governor.

On this page, we have long argued that one of the motivating factors behind the emergence, and now, destruction of the Tea Party was antipathy towards undocumented immigrants. Tea Party politicians have long supported the “business death penalty,” as enacted in statutes like Arizona’s SB 1070, that would revoke business licenses from employers who were found to have employed undocumented immigrants. In addition, mandatory use of E-verify has been a staple of the GOP orthodoxy this year. The Tea Party’s antipathy to what they see as burdensome government regulation never trumped their effort to force employers to enforce federal immigration law and to provide draconian repercussions for their failure to engage in proper record-keeping. The Tea Party’s love of liberty also never stopped them from arguing that the government should deport over 12 million undocumented immigrants. The massive increase in the police authority that mass deportations would require hardly squares with the Don’t Tread on Me ethos the Tea Party claimed to represent.

Romney’s attack on Perry had the desired effect. Perry was gone within a month. But, it confined Romney in a box from which he never escaped. Romney brought in the anti-immigrant Kris Kobach as an adviser on immigration policy, he endorsed the Arizona and all the copycat laws, and he famously espoused the concept of self-deportation, the policy of making life in America so miserable for undocumented immigrants that they would voluntarily return.

Meanwhile, the President was having his own troubles with immigration. Latinos, who supported him strongly in 2008, were angry that the President who promised immigration reform had failed to deliver it and had presided over the most efficient deportation programs in history. With over a million removed during his four years, the President has “enforced the law” far more zealously than any of his predecessors. In addition, the DREAM Act failed in the Senate in 2010 with five Democrats joining nearly all the Republicans in killing the bill. Interestingly, Senator Lisa Murkowski, an independent who had been jettisoned by the Tea Party wing of the GOP in her native Alaska but returned to the Senate as an independent, voted for the bill, showing what reasonable Republicans can do when liberated from the Tea Party. The President’s failure on immigration led to a decided lack of enthusiasm among the Latinos who were responsible for the President’s election in 2008 and the Democrats maintenance of control of the Senate.

Perceptive Republicans saw their opening. Senator Marco Rubio began talking about reviving the DREAM Act, but with Republican modifications. Rubio teased and tantalized the country with his talk of introducing a new DREAM Act. He claimed to be in secret talks with members of the GOP caucus, but it became clear that he could not get any support from his own party. Republican stalwarts like Richard Lugar, a DREAM Act supporter, were facing serious Tea Party challengers. In fact, Lugar would be cashiered by the Indiana Republican party in favor of Richard Mourdock, who went down in defeat on Tuesday. However, Rubio’s tease drew some interest from the Latino community. Although the White House opposed the Rubio DREAM Act proposal (there never was a bill), because there was no path to residence, DREAM Act supporters reached out to Rubio. With Latino organizations and immigrant rights advocates considering supporting the Rubio alternative, the White House knew it had to act.

On June 15, 2012, the administration made the move that would win the election. It announced deferred action for childhood arrivals (DACA). The immense popularity of this program became obvious very quickly. When people could finally apply for DACA on August 15, thousands of people flocked to community events to learn about the benefits. As the first approvals trickled out in late September, thousands of young people received work permits and had hope for the first time in their lives. Republicans denounced the plan, some ICE bureaucrats filed suit against the plan, but it was clear that the Latino community had returned to President Obama. Mitt Romney vowed to cancel the plan and failed to appreciate the demographic shifts and the cumulative weight of the Republican assault on the Latino community.

On Tuesday, the full weight of years of Republican demonization of immigrants came crashing down on Mitt Romney as he attracted only 27% of the Latino vote.

In our next post, we will discuss the prospect of real and substantive immigration reform in the next two years.

3 Responses to “The Role of Immigration in the President’s Re-Election”


  1. Opinion: Attention immigration “activists” — silencing DREAMers is a losing proposition - November 14, 2012

    […] even the infamous deferred action for childhood arrivals (“DACA”) program, which is how President Obama won his second-term. These are all things that we have done to change the […]

  2. Details Emerge on Republican Alternative to DREAM Act « Lifted Lamp - November 16, 2012

    […] Before the tectonic plates shifted last week, there was a recent time that the Republican Party stood a chance to exploit the serious disaffection of the Latino and immigrant communities with the Obama administration.  Last spring, Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) teased the electorate with a so-called “Republican DREAM Act.“  Although no legislation was drafted, Rubio’s attempt to reconcile his party with the immigrant community got serious attention.  Rubio’s proposal was described in the press as providing an opportunity for DREAMers to seek non-immigrant status.  His plan would have created a nonimmigrant visa for DREAMers, which would not generate a new pathway to residence, but would, rather, allow DREAMers temporary status and, if they could find a basis for residence through the traditional means, they would be allowed to adjust status to residence.  Of course, this is all hyperbole as none of this ever made it to the legislative drafting process because Rubio could not gather the support of his party.  The White House, however, was sufficiently concerned with the Rubio proposal that it asked DREAM advocates not to work with Rubio.  When DREAM advocates still seemed open to Rubio’s proposal, the White House moved on DACA.  DACA took all the wind out of Rubio’s sails, and, as we have argued before, may have turned the tide for the President in this election. […]

  3. The ACHIEVE Act is Introduced « Lifted Lamp - November 27, 2012

    […] ACHIEVE Act voted against the DREAM Act in 2010. Its introduction in this lame duck session shows just how much the ground has shifted on immigration since the election. The Democrats should seize the initiative and bring forward the DREAM Act and let the debate […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: